Mrs.Muthukumari v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fourth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.1046 of 2019 MUTHUKUMARI ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAVOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

Crime No.4/2019 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Cr.No.4 of 2019, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, when the de facto complainant's daughter was returning after attending tuition, it is alleged that she was wrongfully restrained by the petitioner and using filthy language threatened with dire consequences due to previous enmity and caused injury.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a false case foisted against the petitioner and also submitted that she has not involved in the alleged occurrence.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that the injured had been treated as 'out patient'.

5. Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions by learned counsels and that the injured has been treated as out patient,this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 24/01/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAVOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.1390

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1046 of 2019 Date :24/01/2019 TK/PN/SAR-4/01.02.2019/3P/6C