Manonmani v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.1492 of 2015 MANONMANI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARANKOVIL TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR. NO.16/2015. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V. MUTHUVELAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 494 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.

16 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.Considering the fact that the de facto complainant is the ExHusband of the petitioner and divorce has already been ordered and A1 in this case has been arrested, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent/police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[d] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law, as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 29/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2.

-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARANKOVIL TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.V. MUTHUVELAN Advocate SR.No. 4163 SR : 02.02.2015 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1492 of 2015 Date :29/01/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/