Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14973/2015allowed

Rajendran v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-07-31Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.07.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P(MD)No.14973 of 2015 1.Rajendren 2.Nagavalli 3.Kala 4.Lalitha 5.Indhirani 6.Raman 7.Malaiyandi 8.Kalimuthan ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 8 -Vs1.State rep. By The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

Crime No.03 of 2014 ... 1st Respondent/Compalainant.

2.Parameswari ... 2nd Respondents /Defacto Complainant PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to call for entire records in relating to C.C.No.32 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.M.S.Jeya Karthik For R - 1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R - 2 : Mr.P.Saravanan

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for entire records in relating to C.C.No.32 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and quash the same.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.

3. The petitioners are arrayed as accused in Crime No.7 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act altered into Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

same has been taken on file in C.C.No.32 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and seeking to quash the said proceedings, the present petition has been filed.

4. The first petitioner is the husband and the other petitioners are the in-laws of the respondent No.2.

5. When the matter is taken up for hearing, a joint memo of compromise has been filed by both parties stating that the dispute has been resolved amicably and the same has also been signed by both the parties duly attested by the counsels.

6. The parties, who are present before this Court, also reiterated the same along with their counsel.

7. In view of the said compromise memo, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose will be served by proceedings further in this matter.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.32 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi is quashed. The said joint memo of compromise is taken on record.

ps Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

1CC to Mr.M.S. Jeyakarthik, Advocate,SR.No.43745 Crl.O.P(MD)No.14973 of 2015 31.07.2015 2P/4C AM/AN.MP/SAR-II/26.08.2015.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/