M.Sumathi v. The Sperintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY M.Sumathi Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Distict, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.

Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Vadivel For Respondent(s): Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (crl. side) Prayer: To Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to takes appropriate action based on the petitioner's complaint as in person on 25.12.2025 and to proceed in accordance with law within the stipulated time framed by this Court.

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to takes appropriate action based on the petitioner's complaint as in person on 25.12.2025.

1/4

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the respondent police had conducted an enquiry and that the same was closed. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police did not visit the spot and no enquiry was conducted. Therefore, the petitioner is now seeking re-enquiry of the matter.

3. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the respondent police is directed to re-enquire into the matter. The petitioner is permitted to prefer a petition before the higher police officials.

4. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 22.01.2026 KSA 2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Distict, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY , J.

KSA W.P.Crl.(MD)No.299 of 2026 22.01.2026 4/4