A. Muthuramalingam v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.1242 of 2019 A. MUTHURAMALINGAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT, CRIME NO.16/2019 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC in Cr.No.16 of 2019 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioner abused the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He would further submit that no one injured in the scene of occurrence.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that no one injured in the scene of occurrence and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions by learned counsels and that the no one injured in the scene of occurrence ,this Court inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Kamuthi, Ramnad District on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 28/01/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KAMUTHI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to MR.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate SR.No.1567 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1242 of 2019 Date :28/01/2019 MSI/VR/SAR-III/30.01.2019-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/