T.R.Palanivel v. R. Parimala

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.03.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR C.R.P.PD(MD).No.353 of 2020 & C.M.P(MD).No.2006 of 2020 T.R.Palanivel ... Petitioner Vs.

1.R.Parimala 2.R.Manikandan .. Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the decree and judgment dated 25.11.2019 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Tiruchirapalli in I.A.No.02 of 2019 in O.S.No.89 of 2016 impleading the petitioner as the 2nd defendant in O.S.No.89 of 2016. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kanagarajah For Respondents : No Appearance

O R D E R

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the endorsement made in the bundle, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 20.03.2024.

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes kpr To The III Additional District Judge, Tiruchirapalli

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

kpr C.R.P.PD(MD).No.353 of 2020 & C.M.P(MD).No.2006 of 2020 20.03.2024