R.D.Sankarachan v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.15129 of 2015 SANKARACHERY ... PETITIONER/RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AUSTINPATTI POLICE STATION, THIRUNAGAR, MADURAI DISTRICT.
(CR.NO.55/14) ... RESPONDENT AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 12/08/15 AND MADE IN MP.NO.1/15 CRL.OP.NO.15129/15.
FOR PETITIONER : M/S.BABU RAJENDRAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MRS.S.PRABHA, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as accused in Crime No.55 of 2014 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 406,420,465,468 and 471 of IPC in Crime No.55 of 2014, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. According to the de facto complainant, the petitioner along with other accused created forged and fabricated documents and sold the property to A1.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is that he helped the other accused for preparation of bogus document. He further submitted that as per the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2513 of 2014, dated 07.02.2014, the co-accused was already granted anticipatory bail
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) vehemently opposed for granting bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the co-accused was already granted anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate-VI, Madurai, and on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 24/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI.
2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AUSTINPATTI POLICE STATION, THIRUNAGAR, MADURAI DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+2 CC to M/S.BABU RAJENDRAN Advocate SR.No. 45892, 48716
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.15129 of 2015 Date :24/08/2015 2P/7C TE/NGM-SS/LIB 31/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/