P.Kamatchiammal v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3008 of 2018 P.Kamatchiammal ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vathalagundu Police Station, Vathalagundu, Dindigul.

2.M.Rajeshwari

...Respondents

Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of petition enquiry on basis of the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.M.Chandrasekaran Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent herein not to harass the petitioner in name of enquiry without due process of law.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the first and second respondents.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits that on the complaint given by Mrs.M.Rajeshwari against the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R. No.57 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police.

4. The petitioner is directed to cooperate with the police for enquiry and at the time of conducting of the enquiry, the petitioner shall not be harassed by the police. The police cannot call the petitioner on a regular basis in the guise of enquiry without even registering an FIR and Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353 has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

enumerated the nature of cases where preliminary enquiry can be conducted and has also restricted the period, for which preliminary enquiry can be conducted. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, first respondent is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against the respondent proceeding to take action in accordance with law.

5. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-III) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vathalagundu Police Station, Vathalagundu, Dindigul.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3008 of 2018 20.08.2018 SJI KK/RP/SAR-3/07.09.2018/2P-4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/