Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15298/2015ordered

S.Vasuki v. State Rep. By

2015-08-07Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Seventh day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.15298 of 2015 S.VASUKI ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 3 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST. CR. NO. 82/2015 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.PANDIARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as A3, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.82 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 21 Kgs of ganja.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that totally there are five accused involved in this case and that A4 and A5 were granted bail by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.9390 of 2015 on the ground that the arrest memo contains crime number.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that this is a case of commercial quantity and therefore the accused is not entitled for anticipatory bail. She further submits that the petitioner is having one previous case similar in nature.

5. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel and considering the fact that the co-accused were released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Principal District Special Court for E.C. and NDPS Act, cases, Madurai, Madurai District, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily twice i.e. at 10.00 a.m and 05.00 p.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

8. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 07/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)TO 1 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT SPECIAL COURT JUDGE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT SPECIAL COURT FOR EC AND NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI MADURAI DIST 2 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST.

1. CC to M/S.B.PANDIARAJAN Advocate SR.No.45042 DM 11 8 15 - 2p 5c

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15298 of 2015 Date :07/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/