← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1624/2021allowed

Saravanakumar.V v. The Regional Transport Officer

2021-02-09Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

W.P(MD)No.1624 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.02.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.1624 of 2021 V.Saravanakumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Collectorate Complex, Chettiyanayakkanpatti Post, Thadikombur Road, Dindigul - 624 001.

2.The Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to return the petitioner's original driving lincense bearing No.TN60 1993 0002188 to the petitioner forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.Prasanth.S For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramar, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner's original driving license was seized by the respondents. This was because the petition mentioned vehicle was involved in Crime No.17 of 2021 registered on the file of the second respondent. It is case of fatal accident.

3. It is settled law that until the licence or any certificate issued by the competent authority is cancelled or suspended or revoked in the manner known to law, it is deemed to be in force. The impounding of licence will come only after passing of the order as per the relevant provisions of the statute, in this case, under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

4. In similar circumstances, a Division Bench of this Court, in P.Sethuram v. The Licensing Authority, The Regional Transport Officer, Dindigul, reported in 2010 Writ L.R. 100, held that even before passing the order under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD)No.1624 of 2021 1988, if driving licence is impounded, it amounts to predetermination of the issue and the authority has no jurisdiction to do so.

5.Applying the aforesaid decision, I hold that the first respondent erred in not returning the petitioner's original driving license. The first respondent is directed to return the petition mentioned original driving license to the petitioner forthwith and without any delay.

6.The writ petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ias Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Collectorate Complex, Chettiyanayakkanpatti Post, Thadikombur Road, Dindigul - 624 001.

2.The Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-4261[F] dated 10/02/2021 ) W.P(MD)No.1624 of 2021 09.02.2021 VB (26.02.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2