← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/984/2026granted

M S Karuppaiah, v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Sub Inspector Of Police, Dcb

2026-01-21Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy7 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21.01.2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.984 of 2026 M.S.Karuppaiah ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Sub Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

(Crime No.1 of 2026) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Sid) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS Act 2023.

PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.

1/7

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 109 of IPC, 1860, in Crime No.1 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the 1st accused had impersonated the defacto complainant and executed a sale deed in favour of the 2nd accused and the said sale deed was written by the petitioner and the same was registered in the office of the Sub Registrar, Kulathur as document No.1995 of 2023. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is a document writer, a false case has been given. He further submitted that the petitioner is willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioner. 2/7

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that there are no previous cases pending against the petitioner and the investigation is still pending. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit some amount to the credit of crime number, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Pudukkottai, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy was made ready and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond 3/7

and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; (b ) the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) to the credit of Crime No.1 of 2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Pudukkottai. On such deposit, the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Pudukkottai, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner. After receipt of entire amount, the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Pudukkottai, shall deposit the said amount in an interest bearing Fixed Deposit in any nationalized Bank initially for a period of one year and renew them periodically until the final order/Judgment is passed in the case in Crime No.1 of 2026. The learned Judicial Magistrate or Trial Court shall pass orders regarding entitlement of the said amount in its final order/Judgment.

(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.,until further orders. (d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; 4/7

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560] and;

(g) if the accused/petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023. (S S Y J) 21.01.2026 msrm 5/7

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Pudukkottai.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Pudukkottai District

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

6/7

S.SRIMATHY,J msrm

ORDER

IN 21.01.2026 7/7