← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15335/2015ordered

Ramalaxmi v. The State Rep By Inspector Of

2015-08-07Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Seventh day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.15335 of 2015 RAMALAXMI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF THIRUCHULLI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 149/15) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.BASKARAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.2 in Crime No.149 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, was arrested on 26.06.2015 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(b) and 302 of I.P.C., and hence, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.06.2015 at about 1.30 p.m., the accused attacked the deceased with aruvalmanai and killed him.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the first accused is the father-in-law and the second accused is the wife of the deceased and ten days prior to the occurrence, there is a wordy altercation arose between the second accused and the deceased and due to which she left from the matrimonial home and she was residing in her sister's house. While so, on 25.06.2015, the deceased came in an inebriated mood with an aruval and attacked the first accused and caused injuries to the first accused and the allegation against the petitioner is that she asked the first accused to murder the deceased. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent and she has not committed any offence as alleged in the above case and she is falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that in a family dispute, the accused have attacked the deceased with Aruval and caused to death.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required.

sd/- 07/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3.THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF THIRUCHULLI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

5.THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON TRICHY, WOMEN WING. +1. CC to M/S.A.BASKARAN Advocate SR.No.44880

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15335 of 2015 Date :07/08/2015 rg.07/08/2015 2p/7c.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/