Gurusamy v. The Tahsildar

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD)No.2042 of 2026 Gurusamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

2.The Block Development Officer, Sanarpatty Panchayat Union, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the second respondent proceedings in Na.Ka.No.438/2024/D2 dated 19.12.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Aruljenifer 1/4

For Respondents : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader for R.1 Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader for R.2

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The impugned communication issued by the jurisdictional Block Development Officer is only recommendatory in nature. The second respondent cannot take any coercive action on his own. As and when the first respondent initiates action based on the recommendation of the second respondent, all the defences of the petitioner can be projected. 3.This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.] 05.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No MGA 2/4

To 1.The Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

2.The Block Development Officer, Sanarpatty Panchayat Union, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and B.PUGALENDHI, J.

MGA 05.02.2026 4/4