Arumugam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) Nos.15511,15512 and 15514 of 2015 ARUMUGAM ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED IN ALL THE CASES. Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARANTHANGI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NOS. 405 OF 2007, 14 of 2013 and 52 of 52 of 2010 (Respectively) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE CASES. For Petitioner : M/S M.SURESH Advocate in all the cases. For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) in all the cases.

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused in Crime Nos.14 of 2013, 405 of 2007 and 52 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police, was arrested on 16.07.2015, 16.07.2015 and 19.03.2015 respectively in pursuance of Non Bailable Warrant issued in C.C.No.107 of 2013 for the alleged offences under Sections 397 and 506(i) IPC, in C.C.No.32 of 2011 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 323, 325, 337 and 355 IPC and in S.T.C.No.49 of 2010 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 506(i) IPC and hence seeks bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to illness, the petitioner could not appear before the trial court and hence, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District has issued Non Bailable Warrant against the petitioner and the learned counsel undertakes that the petitioner would attend the court for all future hearing dates.

3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the following

conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court for all hearing dates without fail, except on those days by filing a petition under Section 317 of Cr.P.C, by assigning valid reasons.

sd/- 11/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARANTHANGI.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI.

3.THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARANTHANGI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

5.THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL ARANTHANGI.

+3. CC to M/S M.SURESH Advocate SR.Nos.45401,45402 & 45403

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.15511,15512 and 15514 of 2015 Date :11/08/2015 rg.11.08.2015 2p/9c.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/