Palaniyappan v. State Rep By Inspector Of

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.15547 of 2015 PALANIYAPPAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THENI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 780 OF 2015.

... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S S.GOKULRAJ ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.ANBARASAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is the sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.780 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner on giving a false promise of getting job in Collectorate Office a6nd Electricity Department, received a sum of Rs.3,90,000/- from the de facto complainant and his brother Mathankumar and hence, a case has been registered against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the the petitioner is working as a Clerk in Taluk Office, Theni and he did not receive any amount from the de facto complainant. He further submitted that the de facto complainant, who is a Personal Assistant of Member of Parliament used to visit Taluk Office, while so, the petitioner refused to do some work in favour of the de facto complainant and hence, a false complaint has been registered against the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.3,90,000/- on giving a false promise of getting job in Collectorate and Electricity Department https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and cheated him. He further submitted that the investigation of the case is pending.

5. Considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner and also the fact that this is a matter of job rocketing, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 10/12/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THENI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S S.GOKULRAJ Advocate SR.No. 70812

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15547 of 2015 Date :10/12/2015 TRP TE/SKS-RR/SAR- II : 14/12/2015 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/