Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1437/2022dismissed for not pressed

Senthil Kumaran A v. Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution Corporation Limited

2022-04-26Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.04.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.1248, 1249 & 3226 of 2022 A.Senthil Kumaran ... Petitioner vs.

1.Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Rep.by the Chairman cum Managing Director 10th Floor, NPKRR Maaligai 144, Anna Salai Chennai-2 2.The Chief Engineer / Personnel Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Administrative Branch 8th Floor, NPKRR Maaligai 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-2 3.The Chief Engineer / Distribution / Madurai Region Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Madurai Regional Office K.Pudur, Madurai-7 4.The Deputy Chief Engineer Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Administrative Branch 8th Floor, NPKRR Maaligai 144, Anna Salai Chennai-2 5.The Superintending Engineer Madurai Electricity Distribution Circle Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Limited 1/3

(TANGEDCO) Madurai District 6.T.Chandran Assistant Executive Engineer / Operation & Maintenance Kamuthi Ramanathaputam Electricity Distribution Circle Ramanathapuram District ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order in Memo No.080968/G.11/G.111/20219, dated 28.12.2021, on the file of the Respondent No.4 and the Impugned Order in memo No.080968/G.11/G.111/2021-1, dated 28.12.2021, on the file of the Respondent No.4 in so far as the petitioner in concerned and the consequential impugned order in Memo No.018522/750/CE/D/MDU/SADO/A.1/Class II/2021, dated 31.12.2021, on the file of the Respondent No.3 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner :

Mr.Lajapathi Roy.T.

For Respondents :

Mr.S.Arivalagan Standing Counsel for R1 to R5 Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran for R6

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that he is not pressing the writ petition.

2. When the petitioner withdraws the writ petition, it is to be construed as he withdraws his entire claim itself in respect of the grounds raised in the writ petition.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) krk 2/3

+1 CC to M/s.T. LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate ( SR-21498[F] dated 27/04/2022 ) and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.1248, 1249 & 3226 of 2022 26.04.2022 GM(CO) TR(06.05.2022) 3P 2C 3/3