Kannan v. State Rep By Inspector Of

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twelfth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.15589 of 2015 1 KANNAN 2 AMALRAJ 3 MURUGAN @ BALAMURUGAN 4 KALI DASS ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1,2,5 & 6 Vs STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADIPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 377 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S C.BETHANASAMY Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1, A2, A5 and A6, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C. in Crime No.377 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the petitioners is that the first petitioner and the de-facto complainant's daughter loved each other and the same was not accepted by the de-facto complainant and lodged a complaint against the petitioners.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 12/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2.

-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADIPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S C.BETHANASAMY Advocate SR.No. 45849 SR : 14.08.2015 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15589 of 2015 Date :12/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/