← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3431/2018ordered

Ram Prakash v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-03-06Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.3431 of 2018 1 RAM PRAKASH 2 MALLIKA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 8/2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 & A2, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 312 r/w Section 109 I.P.C., in Crime No.8 of 2017, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between the first petitioner and the defacto complainant was solemnized on 20.04.2016. Thereafter, the first petitioner had promised to take the defacto complainant to the matrimonial home at Kumbakonam and during the said time, the defacto complainant had also become pregnant. In this circumstances, when the defacto complainant had visited the house of the second petitioner, who is the mother-in-law of the defacto complaint, at that time, the second petitioner had given a cool drink resulting in miscarriage. Hence, a case has been registered for the above said offences.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons, they have been falsely implicated, further added that they have not committed any offence as alleged, and pleads for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) appearing for the State submitted that after completing investigation, charge

sheet has been filed and the same was taken on file as P.R.C.No.03 of 2018 before the concerned Magistrate Court. 5.The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered. It is alleged that during the time of occurrence, the second petitioner herein gave a cool drink to the defacto complainant after mixing poison materials, due to which, the miscarriage was happened to the defacto complainant, further the said alleged occurrence was happened on 22.02.2017, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the police only on 18.08.2017. More over, as of now, after completing investigation, a final report has been filed before the concerned Magistrate Court and the same was taken on file as P.R.C.No.03 of 2018.

So, considering the stage of the case, question of custodial interrogation does not arise, hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, they are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kumbakonam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

(i)the petitioners shall report before the concerned Court daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders.

(ii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iii) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 06/03/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KUMBAKONAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.3566 MSA JAM/14/03/2018/ CM-VR / SAR 3 / 3P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3431 of 2018 Date :06/03/2018