Panjaraj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.15655 of 2015 1 PANJARAJ 2 PANDIAMMAL ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 3 Vs.

STATE REP.BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CR.NO. 99/2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.B.SUTHASATHYANANTH Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as A1 and A3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.99 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners have attacked the de facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences. This is the case and counter case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would that no one has sustained injury.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one has sustained injury, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the second petitioner being a lady shall appear before the respondent police as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 13/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.B.SUTHASATHYANANTH Advocate SR.No.46153 Akm/17.08.2015 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15655 of 2015 Date :13/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/