Muthu Ganesh.C v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI C.Muthu Ganesh .. Petitioner v.

1.The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Chennai - 34.

2.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Sivagangai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner / Fit Person, Sri Adhikorakka Nathar Swamy Temple, Thirupuvanam, Sivagangai District.

4.Mahalingam .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to pass appropriate orders allowing the fourth respondent to retire from service 1/4

as priest in the third respondent Temple, based on the representation dated 16.02.2023 preferred by the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.P.Rajan For Respondents : Mr.P.Subba Raj, Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 *****

ORDER

The petitioner, with a grievance that the fourth respondent was not allowed to retire as a Poosari, has filed this writ petition. 2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader, based on the written instructions provided to him dated 31.01.2024, submitted that the fourth respondent has been permitted to retire. 3.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Index :

Yes / No 02.02.2024 NCC :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes gk 2/4

To 1.The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Chennai - 34.

2.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Sivagangai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner / Fit Person, Sri Adhikorakka Nathar Swamy Temple, Thirupuvanam, Sivagangai District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

gk 02.02.2024 4/4