Arumugam v. State Thro The Inspector Of
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.15873 of 2015 1 ARUMUGAM 2 KARUPPALAGI@KARUPPALAGU (*)3 PALANICHAMY (*)4 MARUTHAI@CHINNADURAI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1-4 Vs THE STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.
(IN CRIME NO. 111/2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.MOHAN Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.111 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners have attacked the de facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences. This is the case and counter case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant grant anticipatory bail https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 18/08/2015 (*)AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 04/09/2015 AND MADE IN MP(MD)NO.1/2015 IN CRL.O.P(MD)NO.15873/2015 ` Sd/- (*)TIME IS EXTENDED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO WEEKS TO FURNISH THE SURETY, FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE ORDER COPY MADE READY.
/ TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURAIYUR.
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.N.MOHAN Advocate SR.No.51870 RL/6 C- 7/9/2015
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.15873 of 2015 Date :18/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/