Kailasam, v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eleventh day of February Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.2129 of 2019 1 KAILASAM, 2 RAJASUNDARI, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 & 3 Vs STATE,REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.K.NAGAR POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.
(CR.NO.68/2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.K.NAVANEETHARAJA Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner was implicated as an accused for the offence under Section 306, 294(b) under SC/ST Act. Hence, anticipatory bail does not arise. Accordingly, this Criminal original Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy in the manner known to law.
sd/- 11/02/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.K.NAGAR POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
PS/PN /SAR-4/20.02.2019/2P/3C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.2129 of 2019 Date :11/02/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/