Silman @ Ramsith Silman v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P(MD)No.1696 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.02.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.1696 of 2022 1.Silman @ Ramsith Silman 2.Hussain Beevi @ Mohamed Hussain Beevi 3.Syed Sulthan ... Petitioners Vs.

State through by 1.The Inspector of Police, Keelakarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(In Crime No.134 of 2013) 2.Ali Fathima ... Respondents Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C.C.No.167 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanthapuram and quash the same as against the petitioners/accused 2 to 4.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Susikumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakhi Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1.

Mr.R.Maheswaran for R2.

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed for quashing the impugned proceedings in C.C.No.167 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram. 2.The defacto complainant/Ali Fathima is present before this Court in person through video conferencing. She has been duly identified by her counsel. The parties have filed a memo of joint compromise. The defacto complainant categorically states before this Court that she does not want to pursue the complaint. When the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the deafcto complainant does not want to pursue the complaint, no purpose will be served in keeping the impugned prosecution alive. The impugned proceedings are quashed. The criminal original petition is allowed. The memo of joint compromise will form part of the order. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (CA & MC) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P(MD)No.1696 of 2022 ias Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Keelakarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Encl: Joint Compromise memo Crl.O.P(MD)No.1696 of 2022 04.02.2022 SS/07.03.2022 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2