Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/38/2018ordered

Geroge, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-01-11Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eleventh day of January Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.38 of 2018 GEROGE ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTRICODE POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.182 OF 2017. RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.P.NARAYANAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.BHARATHI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 447, 379(NP) and 506(i) I.P.C in Crime No.182 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused trespassed into the rubber plantation of the defacto complainant and took away 85 number of rubber sheets and other related articles. Hence, the present case is registered against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the defacto complainant is none other than the brother-in-law of the first accused and the petitioner is the relative of the first accused and he is no way connected with the alleged offence and pleads for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner along with other accused trespassed into the rubber plantation of the defacto complainant and took away 85 number of rubber sheets and other related articles. She further submitted that the investigation is still pending.

5.The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered. This case has been registered against the petitioner for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 447, 379(NP) and 506(i) I.P.C. It is seen that due to civil dispute, the case has been registered against the petitioner and considering the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

fact that the petitioner is the relative of the first accused, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary for completing the investigation.

6.Taking note of all the abovesaid aspects into consideration and having regard to the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(iv) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(v) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 11/01/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PADMANABHAPURAM. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTRICODE POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.P.NARAYANAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.629 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.38 of 2018 Date :11/01/2018 MKV-PM-PN-SAR 3/17.1.2018/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/