Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15991/2015allowed

Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-08-18Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.15991 of 2015 PERUMAL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SOUTH POLICE STATION, CUMBUM.

IN CRIME NO. 304/2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.VANJINATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed accused No.1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 21(A) of Mines and Minerals Act, the Rural Development and Regulation Act, 1957 and Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.304 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner committed theft of 1 unit of sand worth of Rs.3,000/-. She further submitted that the petitioner is having no previous case and the accused Nos.2 and 3 were arrested and released on bail.

4. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial

Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 18/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SOUTH POLICE STATION,CUMBUM.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.G.VANJINATHAN Advocate SR.No.47376

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15991 of 2015 Date :18/08/2015 PA/PRV/SAR-I/21.08.2015/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/