Rajendran, v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16041 of 2015 1 RAJENDRAN, 2 PERIYASAMI, 3 SUNDARAJA PERUMAL, 4 PACKIYARAJ, 5 GANESH, 6 LEKKUSAMY, 7 THANGAVEL, 8 BALU, 9 SANGILI, 10 RAJAGOPAL, 11 ALAGAMMAL 12 KATHAMMAL 13 VEERAMMAL, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 13 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUK POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI TALUK, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT (IN CRIME NO.231/2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.THANGAPANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.
1 to 13, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 336 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.231 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the fourth petitioner is working in Indian Army and the petitioners 11 to 13 are ladies. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) submitted that this is a case of case and counter.
4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 4, 11 to 13 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required and the other petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 19/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARUPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUK POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI TALUK, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.M.THANGAPANDIAN Advocate SR.No.47567 RL/6 C- 24/8/2015
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.16041 of 2015 Date :19/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/