Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16096/2015ordered

D. Meiporul v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-08-28Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16096 of 2015 D. MEIPORUL ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVADANAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 199 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.THIRUVARUTSELVAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147 and 364(A) of IPC, in Crime No.199 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.According to the de-facto complainant, the petitioner along with five other accused kidnapped him on 27.07.2015 demanding ransom. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is working under the de-facto complainant and the petitioner was not paid the salary by the de-facto complainant and when the same was demanded, in order to escape from the liability, this false complaint has been given against him. It is further submitted that no such occurrence has taken place on 27.07.2015 and this false complaint has been given on 13.08.2015. The learned counsel further submitted that the co-accused/A2 was enlarged on anticipatory bail by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.16234 of 2015, dated 24.08.2015. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents. 5.

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUMJUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVADANAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVADANAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.G.THIRUVARUTSELVAN Advocate SR.No.50008

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16096 of 2015 Date :28/08/2015 AM/11.09.2015/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/