Esthar, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.4003 of 2018 ESTHAR, ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.5 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SULAKARAI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(IN CRIME NO.79 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.5, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 341 and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.79 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to the wordy quarrel, the petitioner and other accused are said to have assaulted the defacto complainant and also criminally intimidated him. Thus, on complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital and the investigation of the case is still pending.

5.The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered. It is alleged, due to previous motive, the petitioner and other accused assaulted the defacto complainant and thereby, the defacto complainant has sustained injury. As of

now, the injured was discharged from the hospital after taking treatment. Considering the nature of offences committed by the petitioner, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary for completing the investigation. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail with some stringent conditions to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily 10.00 a.m. for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 14/03/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, VIRUDHUNAGAR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SULAKARAI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate SR.No.4131

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4003 of 2018 Date :14/03/2018 SMA/CM-VR/SAR-4/21.03.2018:3P/6C