M. Karuppasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty First day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16223 of 2015 M. KARUPPASAMY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 Vs STATE REP. BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-1 THALLAKULAM POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT (CR.NO 877/2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MRS.S.PRABHA GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1 in Crime No.877 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.07.2015 for the alleged offences punishable under Section 366 of IPC and Section 5(L) 6 of POSCO Act, and hence, seeks bail.

2. According to the de facto complainant, his daughter aged about 17 years was missing from 24.06.2015 and she was secured on 29.06.2015 and within two days secured from the accused, again the accused have kidnapped his daughter.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is the case of love affair and the alleged victim was having love affair with the petitioner, which was not accepted by the de facto complainant and therefore, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the de facto complainant has filed HCP.No.1082 of 2015 and the girl was produced before the Court and was handed over to the de facto complainant on 13.08.2015. It is further submitted that the victim is now residing with her parents.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

satisfaction of the learned Additional District Sessions Court - cum - Mahila Court, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders.

sd/- 21/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE ADDL. DISTRICT SESSIONS COURT-CUM-MAHILA COURT, MADURAI.

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, BROASTEL SCHOOL, MELUR.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-1 THALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate SR.No. 48312

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16223 of 2015 Date :21/08/2015 2P/6C TE/AN/MP/LIB 24/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/