Madras High CourtCMP(MD)/986/2026ordered

Parammal Alias Kalavathi v. Meenal (Died) Ramachandran (Died) 1. Indirani

2026-03-09Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09/03/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CMP(MD). Nos.986 to 988 of 2026 in SA(MD).No.452 of 2022 Parammal Alias Kalavathi ... Petitioner Vs

1. Meenal (Died) Ramachandran (,Died)

1. Indirani

2. Nagarajan

3. Ravi (Respondents 1 to 3 are Represented by Their Agent K.

4. Selvarani,

5. Jaya Keerthi,

6. Selva Priya,

7. Sundararajan (Died), Pooranam (Died).

8. Peter,

9. Selwin,

10. John,

11. Alwin,

12. Sulochana,

13. Prema,

14. Latha,

15. Ponni,

16. Puppy,

17. Sekar,

18. Manohar, 1/4

19. Sundar,

20. Selvi,

21. S.Dhanaletchumi,

22. S.Tamilarasi,

23. S.Suganthi,

24. S.Jagadeesan,

25. S.Susila,

26. S.Shanthi Thabithal ... Respondents PRAYER :- To Condone the delay of 347 days for filing the set aside the abatement petition caused due to the death of 7th Respondent namely Sundararajan in SA(MD). No.452/2022 and to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 7th respondent and to bring on record the respondents 21 to 26 as legal representatives of the deceased 7th respondent viz., Sundararajan and rank them as respondents 21 to 26 in the SA(MD)Sr.No.452 of 2022.

For Petitioner : Ramalingam K.C,

ORDER

These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 347 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 7th respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 7th respondent, and to implead the legal representatives of the deceased 7th respondent as respondents 21 to 26 in the above Second Appeal.

2/4

2. Mr. S. Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the proposed respondents 21 to 26, except respondent No.24, has no serious objection for the applications being ordered. Notice to the 24th respondent has already been served and his name is also printed in the cause list.

3. Hence, these petitions are allowed.

4. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title.

09.03.2026 TRP 3/4

The respondents 1 to 3, 6, 17 to 20, who are the contesting respondents and remain unserved in the second appeal, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to effect paper publication in anyone issue of Tamil daily having circulation in Ramanathapuram district for the hearing 02.04.2026 4/4