Saravanan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16279 of 2015 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PASUPATHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 335 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as Sole Accused in Crime No.335 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, for the offence punishable under Sections 417 and 420 of I.P.C. and Section 45 of Advocates Act. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.07.2015. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2.According to the de-facto complainant viz., Mr.Raja, the accused, who is not a fully qualified, has been making false representation as if he is an Advocate and cheated lakhs of rupees of innocent people which he came to know through one Mrs.Kavitha.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and falsely implicated in this case and due to matrimonial dispute his mother-in-law Mrs.Kavitha lodged a complaint against the petitioner and his family members which is registered in Crime No.11 of 2015 by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karur and he was granted anticipatory bail on 25.06.2015 in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10824 of 2015.

4.The learned counsel further submitted that no third party has given complaint against the petitioner and at the instigation of his mother-inlaw, the case was registered and he has been incarceration for more than 45 days.

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner contending that the petitioner has cheated innocent public by posing himself as an Advocate.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Considering the period of incarceration and facts of this case, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, and on further condition that the petitioner shall stay at Dharmapuri and report before the Town Police Station, Dharmapuri, daily twice at 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m until further orders. sd/- 24/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, KARUR.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PASUPATHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. 6 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, TOWN POLICE STATION, DHARMAPURI +1. CC to M/S.M.KANNAN Advocate SR.No. 48629. TS/24.08.2015/2P - 8C KBM/SAR -I

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16279 of 2015 Date :24/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/