Veeramani v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.2559 of 2019 VEERAMANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVAKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.128/2013) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.A.MURALIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 506 (ii) IPC in Cr.No.128 of 2013, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) would submit that the respondent police after conducting investigation, closed the case as "Mistake of Fact".

3.In view of the above, the question of granting anticipatory bail does not at all arise. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

sd/- 19/02/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVAKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.A.MURALIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.3450

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2559 of 2019 Date :19/02/2019 TK/PN/SAR-I/25.02.2019/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/