Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2620/2019disposed of

Mahalakshmi, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2019-02-20Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.2620 of 2019 MAHALAKSHMI, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.6 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.5/2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 120(B), 465, 468, 469 and 420 IPC, in Cr.No.05 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner's husband, namely Anbalagan and her husband's friend, namely, Padmanaban have approached the defacto complainant for arranging railway college to the defacto complainant for which the defacto complainant has to pay a sum of Rs.50,00,000/-. Believing the same, the defacto complainant paid a sum of Rs.53,00,000/- to the accused persons on various dates, but the accused persons have not come forward to get permission from the Government for running a college. Thereafter, the defacto complainant approached the accused persons and demanded that to repay the above said amount but they neither paid the amount nor to come forward to get permission to run the college. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner was already https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.483 of 2019 on 18.01.2019, thereafter he was unable to execute the sureties. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner was already granted anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.483 of 2019 on 18.01.2019. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the petitioner is directed to comply with the earlier order passed in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.483 of 2019 on 18.01.2019 within a period of two weeks.

6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is disposed of. sd/- 20/02/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI Advocate SR.No.3454

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2620 of 2019 Date :20/02/2019 TM AE/VR/SAR-II/25.02.2019/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/