← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4399/2018ordered

M.Kaja, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-03-21Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.4399 of 2018 M.KAJA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATHIRAMPATTINAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.30 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.DEENADHAYALAN, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 5 & 7 of Tamil Nadu Lottery Regulation Act, 1998, in Crime No.30 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.03.2018, the petitioner and one other accused found in possession of 25 Assam State Lotteries, which was banned by the Tamil Nadu Government. Hence, the case has been registered for the above said incident.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for anticipatory bail for the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent on instructions, would submit that the lotteries which were illegally possessed by the petitioners have been recovered. According to the prosecution, the investigation is in progress.

5. The submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for either side are considered. It is alleged that during the time of occurrence, the petitioner and other one accused found in possession of 25 Assam State Lotteries, which was banned by the Tamil Nadu Government. As of now, the other accused in this case was arrested and the lotteries, which were possessed illegally by the accused were recovered. Thereby, custodial interrogation may not be necessary for completing the investigation. Therefore, considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.

(ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(iii) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(iv) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 21/03/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISRATE, PATTUKOTTAI, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATHIRAMPATTINAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.DEENADHAYALAN, Advocate SR.No.4568

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4399 of 2018 Date :21/03/2018 PK/PMI/SAR-1/03.04.2018 : 3P/6C