Velmurugan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twelfth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.16469 of 2014 1 VELMURUGAN 2 P. PONNUSAMY 3 VEERAMALI 4 SEETHALAKSHMI 5 ANITHA 6 NATARAJAN 7 RADHA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 7 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.107/2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.KARNAN Advocate For Respondent : MS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC in Crime No.107 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.Initially the matter was referred to Mediation and failure report dated 3.12.2014 has been received.
3. It is seen from FIR that the first petitioner got married to the defacto complainant on 19.08.2013 and they have one child. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) on instruction from the police submits that the first petitioner and the defacto complainant have joined together.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) as to whether the petitioners are complying with the order or not. sd/- 12/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,NO.VI, MADURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM,MADURAI 4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.G.KARNAN Advocate SR.No.6551
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.16469 of 2014 Date :12/02/2015 AA/16.02.2015/2p- 6c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/