T.A. Praveenkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.4447 of 2018 1 T.A. PRAVEENKUMAR 2 T.D. ATHMARAJ 3 T.A. SANTHIYA 4 T.A. VISNUPRASAD 5 PREETHI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

IN CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.M.VIJI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 294(b), 323, 406 and 506(ii) IPC., r/w. Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) on instructions, would submit that as of now, no enquiry/no case is pending against the petitioners.

3. The said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) is recorded. Further, as per the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), as of now, no enquiry/no case is pending against the petitioners. Hence, apprehension of arrest does not arise. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

sd/- 21/03/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.M.VIJI Advocate SR.No.4648 PJL JAM/23/03/2018/ CM-VR / SAR 2/ 2P-4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4447 of 2018 Date :21/03/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/