Vincent, M/60 v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16650 of 2015 VINCENT ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CR.NO.341 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.D.GANESHAMOORTHI Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A4 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 294(b), 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.341 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.According to the de-facto complainant, the accused, by promising to get appointment in TELC Girls Higher Secondary School as Clerk, received Rs.6,00,000/- on 09.05.2012, but failed to keep up their words nor returned the amount.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The learned counsel further submitted that even as per the complaint, A5 namely Yoganand had received Rs.6,00,000/- from the de-facto complainant, while the other accused were presented at that time. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen and he is ready to comply with any condition that may be imposed by this court. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that this is a case of job racketing and the petitioner is also involved in Crime No.340 of 2015 and his earlier applications in both the crimes numbers were dismissed and there is no change of circumstances.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence this petition is dismissed. sd/- 01/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI 2 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16650 of 2015 Date :01/09/2015 AA/14.09.2015/2p-3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/