← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4615/2018ordered

Jeeva, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-03-23Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.4615 of 2018 JEEVA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUGOKARNAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI.

(CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.RAMESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C., in Crime No.Not known of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that while fetching water in a public tap, a wordy quarrel arose between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, at that time, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, a has been registered for the above said offences. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has been falsely implicated in this case, further added that he has not involved in the alleged occurrence. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that injured discharged from the hospital.

According to him, investigation is still pending.

5. The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered. It is alleged, during the time of occurrence, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and he sustained injury. According to prosecution, the injured discharged from the hospital, after completing the treatment. Further, except 506(i) I.P.C., all other petition mentioned offences are bailable in nature. Hence, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary for completing the investigation. Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

Accordingly, he is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pudukkottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of three weeks, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(ii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iii)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 23/03/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISRATE NO.1 PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUGOKARNAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.RAMESH KUMAR Advocate SR.No.4684

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4615 of 2018 Date :23/03/2018 PK/PN/SAR-1/03.04.2018 : 3P/6C