← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4649/2018ordered

Chandra v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2018-03-26Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.4649 of 2018 1 CHANDRA 2 DHANAPAL 3 MANIKANDAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2,3&4 Vs STATE, REP.BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE JAMBUNATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT (CR.NO. 40/2018) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.K.ARUNRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused nos.2 to 4, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.40 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.

The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioners and other accused are said to have assaulted the defacto complainant with knife and also threatened him with dire consequences. Thus, on complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioners.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the no one has sustained injury and the investigation is still pending.

5.The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered. It is alleged, during the time of occurrence, due to civil dispute, the petitioners and other accused have assaulted the defacto complainant and thereby, no one has sustained injury. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one has sustained injury, this Court came to the conclusion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners may not be necessary for completing the investigation. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail with some stringent conditions to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Duraiyur, Trichy District, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(i) the petitioners shall report before respondent Police, daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(ii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 26/03/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

trp TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DURAIYUR, TRICHY DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT.

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE JAMBUNATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.ARUNRAJ Advocate SR.No.4901 GJM/PN/SAR-I-3.4.18-3P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4649 of 2018 Date :26/03/2018