Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3556/2020dismissed

R. Selvaraj v. The Commissioner Of Police

2020-02-26Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.3556 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.02.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.(MD)No.3556 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3005 of 2020 R.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Edamalaipatti Police Station, Trichy.

3.The Branch Manager, ICICI Bank, Colony, A-14/S TRR Towers, East Coast Road, Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli.

... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner and his staff and for the vehicles bearing registration KA 51 AA 7594 and Registration No.KA 51 AA 7549 till the third respondent bank accept the repayment dues towards Commercial Vehicle Loan Agreement No.LVTR100036057359 and regularize the loan account by considering petitioner representation, dated 11.01.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.AL.Kannan For R1 and R2 : Mrs.S.Bharathi Government Advocate(Crl.Side) For R3 : Mr.Pala Ramasamy Standing Counsel

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner and his staff and for the vehicles bearing registration KA-51-AA7594 and Registration No.KA-51-AA-7549 till the third respondent bank accept the repayment dues towards Commercial Vehicle Loan Agreement No.LVTR100036057359 and regularize the loan account by considering his representation, dated 11.01.2020. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.3556 of 2020 2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) would submit that the nature of the dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent is private in nature.

3.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the third respondent would submit that the petitioner has availed the vehicle loan from the third respondent bank and that he has not paid the amount.

4.It is seen that the dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent in respect of non-payment dues towards the vehicle loan. Therefore, This Court is of the opinion that such a prayer is not maintainable.

5.Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD - II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Sji To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Edamalaipatti Police Station, Trichy.

+1 CC to M/s.PALARAMASAMY, Advocate ( SR-8817[F] dated 27/02/2020 ) +1 CC to M/s.AL.KANNAN, Advocate ( SR-9398[F] dated 28/02/2020 ) W.P.(MD)No.3556 of 2020 26.02.2020 CV/(08.05.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2