Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16821/2015allowed

Gopi v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-01Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16821 of 2015 1 GOPI 2 THANGAMAI ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 3 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CR.NO. 329/2015 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.SUTHASATHYANANTH Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 336 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.329 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused have assaulted the de-facto complainant with hands and also threatened him with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that this is a case of case and counter and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 01/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.B.SUTHASATHYANANTH Advocate SR.No.50374 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16821 of 2015 Date :01/09/2015 PBK/GSV-PM/SAR-II 03/09/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/