Nehru v. The State Rep The Ins Of Polic

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16843 of 2015 1 NEHRU 2 CHINNAPILLAI 3 N.DHARMAR 4 VANITHA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 to 4 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CR NO.20 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.B.SUTHA SATHYANANTH Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.M.NATARAJAN, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 to A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498(A) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.20 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners demanded more dowry from the de-facto complainant and also harassed her. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant and it is further submitted that as per direction of this Court, the first petitioner had appeared before the Mediation Centre, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ but the de-facto did not appear before the Mediation Centre for two hearings.

4.Mr.M.Natarajan, learned counsel appearing for the intervenor vehemently opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

8. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 23/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

+1CC to M/S.B.SUTHASATHYANANTH Advocate SR.No.56247 +1CC to M/S.M.NATARAJAN, Advocate Sr.No.56309 Akm/29.09.2015 /2p-7c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16843 of 2015 Date :23/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/