Madras High CourtCMP(MD)/7668/2016dismissed

Lakshmanan v. Coastal Gujarath Powerjen

2016-09-27Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR CMP(MD) No.7668 of 2016 and MP(MD)No. 1 of 2015 IN CRP(MD) No.2064 of 2015 LAKSHMANAN ... PETITIONER/1st RESPONDENT Vs 1 COASTAL GUJARATH POWERJEN PVT.LTD., R.MURALIKUMAR, S/O.LATE.G.N.R.NAIDU, OFFICE NO.5, MOORES ROAD, EGMORE, CHENNAI-600 006.

2 M.KARUPPASAMY, 3 M.SUBRAMANI 4 T.THANGASAMY, 5 K.PALANI 6 K.PERUMADAYAN, 7 M.PALANI 8 S.PALANI 9 S.KUMARANDI, 10 N.K.BALAJI, 11 V.ANAIVEERAN @ VELLASAMY, 12 V.THANGAPANDI, 13 V.THANGAMARIAPPAN, 14 V.GANESAN, 15 V.MARIMUTHU, 16 V.RAMAR, 17 V.LAKSHMI, 18 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, OFFICE AT TIRUNELVELI ROAD, THOOTHUKUDI.

19 THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPIDARAM TALUK, OFFICE AT WGC ROAD, THOOHUKUDI. 20 THE SUB-REGISTRAR, KEEZHUR SRO, OFFICE AT NEW BUS STAND, THOOTHUKUDI.

(RESPONDENTS 2 to 20 are set exparte, hence notice may be dispensed with) ...RESPONDENTS 2 to 20/RESPONDENTS 2 to 20 Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to vacate the Interim stay granted in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 in CRP(MD) No.2064 of 2015 dated 18.11.2015.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

PRAYER IN MP(MD)No. 1 of 2015 in CRP(MD)No. 2064 of 2015 : To stay all further proceedings of the suit in O.S.No. 108 of 2014 before the Honourable Principal District Munsif,Thoothukudi. ORDER :This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.PRABHU RAJADURAI, Advocate for the petitioner in CRP(MD)No.2064/2015 and MP(MD)No. 1/2015 and of M/s.A.B.Prabhakar Advocate for the petitioner in CMP(MD)No.7668/2016 in CRP(MD)No. 2064/2015 and the court made the following order:- The learned counsel for both parties submitted that the main Civil Revision Petition may be posted for final disposal. Hence the interim stay already granted is made absolute. Hence the vacate stay application cannot be entertained at this stage and the same is dismissed.

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that application filed Under order 7 Rule 11 is dismissed. Hence the Civil Revision Petition is filed against the dismissed order. Post the Civil Revision Petition itself for final disposed on 08.11.2016, on the top of the final hearing cases. sd/- 27/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, THOOTHUKUDI JA-DB-SAR.III-04.10.2016-2P:2C ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.7668 of 2016 IN CRP(MD) No.2064 of 2015 Date :27/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/