Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16909/2015allowed

Sudhir Sharma v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-01Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.16909 of 2015 SUDHIR SHARMA ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELLIYANAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

(CR.NO. 175/2015) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.BALAJI Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(b), 506(ii) of I.P.C., r/w. Section 66 Y(b) IT Act in Crime No.175 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. According to the de-facto complainant, he was working under the first accused in a quarry run by him and he made a complaint against the accused for illegal mining and thereafter, he was threatened and the accused have also attempted to demolish the house of the de-facto complainant.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and it is further submitted that the de-facto complainant has already filed a suit in O.S.No.356 of 2014 against the petitioner and the same is pending before the District Munsif Court, Karur and when the suit is riped for trial, a false complaint was given against the

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be

released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 01/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II KARUR.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARUR 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELLIYANAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.V.BALAJI Advocate SR.No.50593 Akm/07.09.2015 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16909 of 2015 Date :01/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/