Chinnamani, W/O.Nallusamy v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Second day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.4868 of 2018 1 CHINNAMANI 2 RENUGADEVI 3 SATHIYA 4 SENTHILKUMAR 5 JOTHI 6 KRISHNAN 7 KARUPPANNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED A1 TO A4,A6, A8,A9 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRACH, DINDIGUL, CRIME NO.67 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MUTHUKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.A1 to A4, A6, A8 and A9, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B, IPC in Crime No.67 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a civil dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. Therefore, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint and the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.67 of 2015, on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any of the offences as alleged by the prosecution. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the investigation is still pending.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 02/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.MUTHUKRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.5240 TSG CSL/PN/SAR-IV/05.04.2018 :2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4868 of 2018 Date :02/04/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/