← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17034/2015ordered

Sivakumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-02Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Second day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17034 of 2015 1 SIVAKUMAR 2 SINDHU 3 MURUGAN ASARI 4 SARASVATHY 5 SIVARAJ ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 2 TO 6 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMAN POLICE STATION, THIRUCHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S K.P.NARAYANAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 to 6, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A) of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.9 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the accused No.1 was arrested and released on bail. 3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent.

4.Considering the facts accused No.1 was arrested and released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 02/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF - CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM. 2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMAN POLICE STATION, THIRUCHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S K.P.NARAYANAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.51681. TS/04.09.2015/2P - 6C AAL-MPA/SAR -II

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17034 of 2015 Date :02/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/