V,Wincent v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Third day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.4934 of 2018 1 V.WINCENT 2 V.MARIYA AROCKIYAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT (CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.K.RAMANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) & 506(i) of IPC r/w 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime Not known of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.There was a wordy quarrel and family dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioners. The petitioners along with other accused abused the defacto complainant using filthy language and also threatened her. Therefore, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint and the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.not known of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any of the offences as alleged by the prosecution. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the State.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain

conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 03/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.RAMANATHAN Advocate SR.No.5284

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4934 of 2018 Date :03/04/2018 MKV-CM-VR-SAR 4/9.4.2018/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/