← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4944/2018granted

Shamnuga Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-04-02Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Second day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.4944 of 2018 SHAMNUGA PANDIAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Rank Not Known Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUMANGALAM TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 79 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.C.SENTHIL MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who arrayed as accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379 IPC in Crime No.79 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The subject matter of this theft are two goats. The same has since been recovered from A1. The petitioner is only a friend of A1.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed.

sd/- 02/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUMANGALAM TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.C.SENTHIL MURUGAN Advocate SR.No.5263 SKM JAM/06/04/2018/ PN / SAR 4/ 2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4944 of 2018 Date :02/04/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/