T.Paneer, v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eleventh day of January Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.511 of 2018 T.PANEER, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT POLICE STATION (CRIME), TRICHY CITY.
(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHIR, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Police Submitted that petition enquiry in C.S.R. No.158 of 2017 dated 23.12.2017 is pending.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the respondent police is directed to complete the enquiry within a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ period of three week by way of registering the case or close the enquiry as no prima facie case is made out. The above process shall
be completed within the above said period. During the time of enquiry, the respondent police should not harass the petitioner. 5.With the above observations, this Criminal Original petition is disposed of.
sd/- 11/01/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
SMI/GNS TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT POLICE STATION (CRIME), TRICHY CITY.
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.630 GJM/CM/VR/SAR-2-23.1.18-2P-4C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.511 of 2018 Date :11/01/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/