← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/616/2018disposed of

Sudha v. The Commissioner Of Police

2018-01-12Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.01.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.616 of 2018 Sudha ... Petitioner -VsState rep. by 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, 2.The Inspector of Police, Transport Investigation Wing(TIW-Unit III), Karimedu Police Station, Madurai.

... Respondents Prayer: This Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent Police to conduct proper and speedy investigation in the case registered in Crime No.68 of 2017 on the file of the second respondent and to file a final report before the Court concerned, within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.B. Jameel Arasu For respondents : Mr.Prabhu Ramachandran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to file a final report in Crime No.68 of 2017, within the time stipulated by this Court.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that on 18.03.2017, when the petitioner and her husband along with their daughter were travelling in their Two Wheeler at Theni main road, Virathipattu Benner Colony, near Door. No.1, Sampath's house at about 2.40 p.m., one van came in the opposite direction and the Driver of the said van, drove the said van with rash and negligent manner and hit against the Two Wheeler in which the petitioner and their family members were travelling and after the said occurrence, the van Driver without stopping the Van drove the van and escaped from the scene of occurrence. He further submitted that in the said occurrence, the petitioner's husband died and the petitioner sustained serious injuries, but, so far, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

second respondent has not identified the van and because of not identifying the said van, the petitioner and her daughter are not in a position to file a petition seeking compensation.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the second respondent is taking effective steps to identify the offending vehicle and he seeks some more time for filing a final report.

4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the second respondent is directed to take effective steps to identify the offending vehicle and file a final report in Crime No. 68 of 2017, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSII) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, 2.The Inspector of Police, Transport Investigation Wing(TIW-Unit III), Karimedu Police Station, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Trp RL/4C/2P/KK/SAR1/23/1/2018 Crl.O.P.(MD) No.616 of 2018 12.01.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/